Home
The Plan
Project Overview
Mining & Processing
Tailings Storage
Water Management
Transportation Route
Port Facilities
Power & Pipeline
Reclamation
The Facts
Dear Alaskans...
Where is Pebble?
How Big is It?
What About the Fish?
Are Tailings Toxic?
Okay... Earthquakes!
But the Science...
Who Benefits?
What are the Facts?
Final EIS
Current Status
Executive Summary
Table of Contents
Stay Engaged
All EIS Documents
Background
Our Commitment
Why We Mine
Green Technologies
Geography
People & Culture
Geology
The Environment
Economic Opportunity
News & Media
News Releases
Publications
Newsletters
Posters
Videos
Photos
Careers
Join the Pebble Team
Employment Booklet
Colleges & Universities
Apprenticeship Programs
Contact Us

The Pebble Partnership

Home
The Plan
Project Overview
Mining & Processing
Tailings Storage
Water Management
Transportation Route
Port Facilities
Power & Pipeline
Reclamation
The Facts
Dear Alaskans...
Where is Pebble?
How Big is It?
What About the Fish?
Are Tailings Toxic?
Okay... Earthquakes!
But the Science...
Who Benefits?
What are the Facts?
Final EIS
Current Status
Executive Summary
Table of Contents
Stay Engaged
All EIS Documents
Background
Our Commitment
Why We Mine
Green Technologies
Geography
People & Culture
Geology
The Environment
Economic Opportunity
News & Media
News Releases
Publications
Newsletters
Posters
Videos
Photos
Careers
Join the Pebble Team
Employment Booklet
Colleges & Universities
Apprenticeship Programs
Contact Us
GTI Tech Account
September 4, 2008

Alaskans Confident in State Protections

GTI Tech Account
September 4, 2008

Voters issued a clear vote of confidence in the State of Alaska’s water quality standards and regulatory protections for salmon and human health when they defeated Ballot Measure 4 last week, said Pebble Partnership CEO John Shively.

“Ballot Measure 4 and its proponents challenged the state’s environmental standards and overall regulatory framework for hard rock mining, and suggested they were insufficient to protect Alaska’s important water and fisheries resources,” Shively said. “Alaskans disagreed, and reinforced their support for the state and federal permitting process and existing standards for water quality and fish protection as the appropriate measures by which the Pebble Project and other mines in the state should be judged.”

Ballot Measure 4 was defeated by a 57 – 43 majority. If approved by Alaska voters, the initiative could have introduced new, undefined regulations for all hard rock mines in the state.

“Notwithstanding the outcome of this important vote, the Pebble Partnership remains committed to going beyond compliance with existing environmental regulations to ensure that the significant fisheries resources of Bristol Bay are protected,” Shively said.

The Pebble Partnership is currently advancing project design and engineering programs for the Pebble Project, and is expected to finalize a Prefeasibility Study in the second half of 2009 after receiving stakeholder input.

Once the Prefeasibility Study is complete, the Partnership will apply for the requisite state and federal permits for the Pebble Project. The permitting process will be guided by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), involve at least 11 state and federal regulatory agencies, and provide multiple and ongoing opportunities for public input. This process is expected to take three years to complete.

Newer PostKeystone Center to Assess Dialogue
Older PostEnvironmental & Economic Data Report Series

Get the Latest News Updates

Thank you!
Back to Top

Pebble Limited Partnership

2525 Gambell Street, Suite 405
Anchorage AK 99503*
*Please note new address as of Aug. 11, 2021

Phone: (907) 339-2600
info@pebblepartnership.com

Legal Notice

© 2020 Pebble Limited Partnership. All Rights Reserved.